|
The
Insighter |
Neo Insight's e-newsletter on Customer Experience topics and techniques.
We invite you to subscribe to our monthly e-newsletter: In this issue
Upcoming events
|
| University of Toronto | 17 |
| University of Waterloo | 64 |
| University of Regina | 413 |
| Memorial University | 436 |
| Carleton University | 635 |
| University of Guelph | 720 |
| Simon Fraser University | 836 |
| York University | 848 |
| University of New Brunswick | 6,010 |
| University of Windsor | 12,100 |
Now, results like this need to be thought about a bit - especially if you're in the middle ranking. If you're at the low end you might cheer and look to focus your management attention elsewhere. In the middle ranks, you should probably take a closer look at the results pages to see what's actually going on.
But if you're at the University of New Brunswick or the University of Windsor, or any other university with more than, say, 1,000 "click here" links, or an order of magnitude greater than the industry average, then there's certainly some systemic problem that needs to be addressed. What's the best way to address the possible causes? The answer depends: what works well will differ from one organization to another.
Provide guidelines and standards
Maybe it's a simple matter of including a few guidelines in your internal web design or content standards:
Or you might want to be more constructive, and add a second guideline:
Train authors in task-oriented content production
But maybe there's a lack of understanding amongst content authors about basic usability and accessibility. Training in task-oriented content production (with less of a focus on 'writing', or 'copy') might bring those authors up to an acceptable level. You then might start to plan how your organization will advance from baseline performance, to delivering excellent performance.
Delegate responsibility for quality control to project managers
Perhaps it's a process and organizational issue. Detailed quality issues like this should be prevented, rather than trapped and corrected. And they should be prevented locally, not centrally. Quality control and prevention at this level should be owned by your local managers, the people to whom content authors report. Highlight a number of these issues and metrics (especially customer task performance) and monitor them in annual performance reviews. Then train and mentor your project managers as needed. It will be cheaper and more effective than trying to train all your authors centrally, especially if you're aiming to build a more open authoring system.
Focus your effort on root causes that give the biggest paybacks
Investigate the "click here" metric's results in more depth. Maybe the problem is localized in specific areas of your website, or in particular types of content. Compare specific areas of a website by constraining the Google search like this: ‘site:*.yoursiteURL/yourwebdirectory’. Perhaps many of the link labels are automatically generated by an application. Or maybe one department or part of the organization is producing more than its fair share of "click here" links. Either way, there may be ways to focus on cost-effective solutions that tackle root causes and give big wins, rather than tackling everything at once.
If you try this simple "click here" measure and think it uncovers a serious underlying organizational issue, give us a call (613 271-3001), and ask us about Customer Carewords, or our Search Performance Indicator techniques, and other techniques to tackle this problem and to improve your customer experience.
See also:
Neo Insight contributed t-shirts and pens toward the ChangeCamp Ottawa un-conference held May 16th at City Hall.
The theme was “re-imagining government and citizenship in the age of participation”.
Highlights for us were mostly around the level of engagement and will to participate. Discussions were lively and unflagging. Inspiring at times.
Scott Smith of Neo Insight held a discussion session to discuss the Top Tasks of Canadians on government websites – the ground rules being to: (a) use verbs; (b) list what people do; (c) ignore federal vs. provincial vs. municipal. Nice ideas came out, like the need to select what interface citizens prefer, and the ability to use that interface on other government websites, not just federal. Most of all, it was impressive to witness the immediacy and scope of publishing via the wiki, Twitter, Flickr, etc.
Read the blow-by-blow at http://search.twitter.com/search?q=cco09
Scan the photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/cco09/ Here's a few:
See the results of the Top Tasks discussion and contribute to the wiki at: http://wiki.changecamp.ca/ChangeCamp_Ottawa/The_Grid/J1. Please contribute your thoughts.
See the output from some of the other sessions:
In case you didn't know, you can also follow us on Twitter - glimpse all the 'small stuff' that doesn't make it into this newsletter, and hear the news even sooner - http://twitter.com/NeoInsight
“We read website navigation like we read a car navigation system. We're looking for that exact link (next turn) we need to click on. We have a destination in mind and we want to get there as quickly as possible."
Gerry McGovern, New Thinking newsletter - June 1, 2008
If you have any comments on The Insighter, or ideas on usability topics you'd like to hear about, send us an email with your comments.
We invite you to subscribe to our monthly e-newsletter.
| Home | About Us | Services | Case Studies | Training | Teamworks |